maz91379 wrote: I was told at some point that males have remnants of a tiny vagina on their pubic bone. Was i lied to ?
there's a tiny vagina in each and every one of us.
mathias wrote:I heard that Tom Dalton read a book on how to grow online communities around your business. But he thought it was too much work so he just created a forum full of alts. You and I are the only real people.
maz91379 wrote: I was told at some point that males have remnants of a tiny vagina on their pubic bone. Was i lied to ?
there's a tiny vagina in each and every one of us.
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
I don't believe one sex comes from the other.. I think they are simply variations on the same thing.
We have analagous genitalia, not genitalia that "overgrows" from one dominant gender to create a second gender, it only develops differently in accordance with chomosomes and shit... Where in the fuck did you folks learn ideas like that?!
That's how I'm reading some of these posts anyway.
the way i understand it, chromosomes do determine sex, however there is no development of genitalia for quite some time. it doesn't really develop just because of the chromosomes. fetuses are pretty much the same until genitalia development is triggered by hormones hanging out in the mom. without these hormones, a fetus that is chromosomally male can appear female.
so yeah, it really all goes back to how you define gender.
mathias wrote:I heard that Tom Dalton read a book on how to grow online communities around your business. But he thought it was too much work so he just created a forum full of alts. You and I are the only real people.
Achtane wrote:There are probably more girls on the internets than you'd think, but I bet they don't reveal themselves cause dudes are always worshipping them.
Conventional wisdom is that girls dig that kind of thing though
Yeah, I guess so.
And the Girls Only Threads are basically there just to draw the lurkers attention. I find the closed group topics posted on open forums in general make me second guess the original posters hidden motivations. Usually I find them very... agenda-centered if not simply fishy. How about a SCIENTOLOGISTS ONLY or a FREEMASONS ONLY or a POLITICIANS RELATIVES ONLY or WHITE MALE CAUCASIAN ONLY threads around? It's not the same thing, no, I know, but I also know - well, hope, really - You know what I mean.
But hey - that's only the good old suspiscious me
:::: Metal up Yöur Jazz! with FUZZIFERblack psychedelic doom ::::
Ugly Nora wrote:It's a sad day when Bassus Sanguinis becomes the voice of reason.
i would be down for a freemason's only thread. the illuminati seem like they know how to party.
i promised myself if i ever 'made it' in music i would put illuminati imagery all over EVERYTHING! if only for the lulz.
mathias wrote:I heard that Tom Dalton read a book on how to grow online communities around your business. But he thought it was too much work so he just created a forum full of alts. You and I are the only real people.