||||| wrote:jrfox92 wrote:popvulture wrote:not sure if that'll bleed into Autolux, tbd I suppose. One of the more intriguing examples that made me actually consider the idea of having one of those someday.
It hasn't so far (as of when I saw them last year, still well after Failure rebooted).
I, honestly, don't think it ever will since he's been so particular about his Autolux rig.
Yeah, it's a taped up All Access. He still uses it but I'm not sure for how much longer - he had a problem with it when playing Lollapalooza 2016 and couldn't get one of the footswitches activated. I doubt he will ever switch to Axe FX for Autolux - like you said, he's really particular and loves tube amps.
I think the same. There seems to be a definite operational aesthetic to Autolux; for Greg, that probably includes the variable fidelity and peculiar sounds of combinations of pedals, rack gear, etc. Though he's still switching loops via MIDI, there's less "computer interfacing" and more direct action through hardware signal paths than in Failure's latest conception, for example. I could see sticking with a functioning All Access for Autolux duties for that reason – it's a simpler machine than a Mastermind GT and requires less intellectualizing to play with in some ways – but after the work is done setting up a MM GT for your purposes, there's no beating its capability. It could perform many functions for him in his Autolux role.
That being said, I really like how it's impossible to predict his moves with complete certainty. He can and will use any gear that does what he needs it to do regardless of reputation or whatever some cultural coterie might think about it. He'll play a fretless Wal and an off-the-shelf Precision or seek setup consultation from the guy who built racks for Toto. Though the Axe-FXs were used mainly (I think) for reproducible sound quality, portability and reliability in the Failure realm, it's
possible that he could do anything. (By the way, the Failure show that I saw on their last tour was the best-sounding live show I've ever heard. It was like listening to the record through enormous studio monitors – not clinically clean, just big and clear – and I have to think that the Axe-FXs deserve some of the credit. Hum (whom I love) was on the same bill, and they sounded like a local band in comparison; regardless of the standard opener/headliner discrepancies, the difference was remarkable and kind of embarrassing.)
||||| wrote:What do you need help identifying on his board? I'm pretty sure I know everything at this point - I've got a huge library of pictures I've gathered over the last 10 years or so. What era are you talking about?
If you have any leads on his signal path let me know - I'm always interested to know what others think about it.
I am too! If you guys don't mind sharing what you've learned a little more widely, I know that I, for one, would enjoy seeing/reading it.