Well, at least, they're releasing the Amelia Earhart files...

[fcknoise]

You can always count on chank to add the proper musical bits to whatever you're writing

[Chankgeez]

Been listening to that one a lot lately. It's very topical.

[Mudfuzz]

[Chankgeez]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHgSSUXcj2Q[/youtube]

[warwick.hoy]

We are all doomed.

[Fluffytime]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uHgV2R9H7o[/youtube]

[Faldoe]

Here's a fun one:
http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/23/don ... modernism/

Yeah, did you read it? Regarding Post-Modernism and the left he is correct.

Also implying "white" and "non-white" are classes

Breaking: they are. And, under this spectrum, Carlton would totally be a "white person"... He stopped eating pork, he stopped eating greens, he traded in his dashiki for some Jordache jeans, etc.

Are you white or a non-person of color? There seems to be this trend that has been happening for some time in which both people of color and non-POF will "de-black" or remove any person of color from their respective race if said person doesn't have the "right" ideological beliefs or if they don't have a familial or financial background that the critical group deems agreeable. This happened when young black students on college campuses were critical of BLM. The response from BLM students at the respective colleges was to call their fellow critical black students "House n*****s" and the like or not really black simply for disagreeing with BLM.

White "allies" sympathetic to the BLM and social justice craze also seem to help do this dirty work by trying to deprive a person of color of their racial identity of background by trying to sell certain aspects of their life or experience precluded them from their race cause they don't share some common theme with the rest of the group.

Also your characterization of Carlton and a kind of list of attributes of what constitutes "black" via class is in itself a racist of prejudicial categorization. This kind of "boxing in" the current left is engaging in only further marginalizes and limits black people by saying in order to truly be black you not only have to have the obvious aspect which is skin color/genetic origins that constitute "to be black" but that you also must have a certain economic and ideological view to be black.

Are all successful black people not black because of their economic status?

[D.o.S.]

I don't post links that I don't read.

[D.o.S.]

Although I appreciate your particular flavor of insipid twat, that's for sure.

[Faldoe]

Although I appreciate your particular flavor of insipid twat, that's for sure.

always no substance with you Great leftist move.

[Chankgeez]

Great leftist move.

That's the name of our (you, me & D.o.S.'s) new socialist disco band.

Together we'll get them movin' on the dance floor.

[D.o.S.]

Although I appreciate your particular flavor of insipid twat, that's for sure.

always no substance with you Great leftist move.

Considering that my only interaction with you is you treating politics like a team sport and/or categorically dismissing my posts, there's not much incentive to put in the effort for substantial dialog, is there?

Anyway I see you've mashed your face on the keyboard and written a diatribe inserting yourself into a fun/jokey conversation that has nothing to do with you in addition to your initially cute (and curt) post. Will read later.

[Faldoe]

Although I appreciate your particular flavor of insipid twat, that's for sure.

always no substance with you Great leftist move.

Considering that my only interaction with you is you treating politics like a team sport and/or categorically dismissing my posts, there's not much incentive to put in the effort for substantial dialog, is there?

Anyway I see you've mashed your face on the keyboard and written a diatribe inserting yourself into a fun/jokey conversation that has nothing to do with you in addition to your initially cute (and curt) post. Will read later.

I don't treat it as a team sport and my condemnation of all the stupid shit the left is currently doing is in no way a pendulum swing and backing of the absurdities of the right. I'm critical and pissed at the Left cause I'd say most of my views on social and environmental things are in the left sphere but the identity politics, anti-free speech and feelings over reason and logic currently emanating from the Left/SJW left has to stop.

Whenever I pose a critical response to you there is never a counter-argument from you but some kind of clever/comedic dismissal or some obscurantist statement. I'd love dialog.

The latter part of the above quoted post of yours is a perfect example.

Great leftist move.

That's the name of our (you, me & D.o.S.'s) new socialist disco band.

Together we'll get them movin' on the dance floor.

Lets do it! But is there a limit though to the amount of gender pronouns we can put our name tags that we'll wear on stage?

[Chankgeez]

[D.o.S.]

Whenever I pose a critical response to you there is never a counter-argument from you but some kind of clever/comedic dismissal or some obscurantist statement. I'd love dialog.

The latter part of the above quoted post of yours is a perfect example.

I'm not sure thats not true in the aggregate, though. I've "legitimately" answered several posters in this thread. As far as I can see you just want a token "opponent" and while I'm willing to do that for all sorts of ILFers I do t particularly care to extend that to you, not out of malice but because you rarely articulate anything beyond "LOL SJWs"

So, sorry? I just don't want you to feel that I'm not available to argue because I can't string together anything worth arguing -- it's because it's not worth my time to argue with someone who responds to a link I share with "xD did you read this before sharing it's totally calling 'your people' out."