my only "worry" is that I'll probably end up with two or three more of them . . .
Moderator: Ryan
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
Ryan wrote:Ok cool, thanks Tim! Maybe I'll do something envelope related that's a separate thing from the BQ and just let the BQ do its thing, just pondering...
ALLisNOISE wrote:you can dial in some wonderfully smeared 12bit cascades of cicadas leveling a hail of rockets against an army of rusty box fans!
Ryan wrote:Thanks for posting the cool settings, Paul and Adam, much appreciated dudes!
Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests