Moderator: Ghost Hip
friendship wrote:You motherfuckers think I won't fuck up a couple octoroks and assemble the Triforce?
PuddysJacket wrote:You're jumping through some serious hoops now. All I said was: nobody's been convicted yet. So in other words, might wanna hold off on acting like the dude's a rapist until he's been proven to be.
Eivind August wrote:Edit: So, we don't know yet. People were saying that this sucks and that nobody is pure. Then you enter with the «We don't know, she might lie»-thing. What exactly prompted you to do that?
aens_wife wrote:PuddysJacket wrote:You're jumping through some serious hoops now. All I said was: nobody's been convicted yet. So in other words, might wanna hold off on acting like the dude's a rapist until he's been proven to be.
Jesus christ, you knuckle dragger - Convictions don't usually happen in sexual assault cases and you fucking know that. Stats show that men rarely believe women, even when there is proof, so how would we go about getting these convictions? How do we convince you that rape and violence happened, if you were on the jury, since you start with the assumption that the woman is lying and trying to ruin the lives of men around her? When the cops assume you are lying? When the fucking president assumes you are lying?
Tell me, oh impartial judge of all things, how are women suppose to get any justice AT ALL when the majority of men in power do not want to end sexual violence. If a majority of powerful men wanted to end it, we would see changes. We would see rape kits get tested. We would see abuser cops thrown off the force. We would see military personnel dishonorably discharged when they were caught abusing or harassing their fellow officers. We would see jailers fired when they abuse inmates (who are mostly male and do not report either).
But we don't see those things, do we? We see powerful men defending the right to rape and harass women and you, sir, are part of that problem.
Go find a fucking therapist and dig deal into your issues regarding women with them. Don't do it in public and especially don't do it here.
PuddysJacket wrote:Eivind August wrote:Edit: So, we don't know yet. People were saying that this sucks and that nobody is pure. Then you enter with the «We don't know, she might lie»-thing. What exactly prompted you to do that?
Probably the fact that the general sentiment on the first couple pages was "wow, nobody saw this coming....really sucks. Why are men like this?".....as if this was something definite, set in concrete. People lie all the time, that's why we have due process. If you're asking me to be open to the idea that the dude raped her while she was unconscious - of course. But taking one side of a story as fact is retarded, and is what almost everyone on this thread is doing.
Hate to point to the Gira thing again...but I had the same stance in that case and guess what? The chick was full of shit and just angry he didn't return her feelings.
friendship wrote:You motherfuckers think I won't fuck up a couple octoroks and assemble the Triforce?
PuddysJacket wrote:aens_wife wrote:PuddysJacket wrote:You're jumping through some serious hoops now. All I said was: nobody's been convicted yet. So in other words, might wanna hold off on acting like the dude's a rapist until he's been proven to be.
Jesus christ, you knuckle dragger - Convictions don't usually happen in sexual assault cases and you fucking know that. Stats show that men rarely believe women, even when there is proof, so how would we go about getting these convictions? How do we convince you that rape and violence happened, if you were on the jury, since you start with the assumption that the woman is lying and trying to ruin the lives of men around her? When the cops assume you are lying? When the fucking president assumes you are lying?
Tell me, oh impartial judge of all things, how are women suppose to get any justice AT ALL when the majority of men in power do not want to end sexual violence. If a majority of powerful men wanted to end it, we would see changes. We would see rape kits get tested. We would see abuser cops thrown off the force. We would see military personnel dishonorably discharged when they were caught abusing or harassing their fellow officers. We would see jailers fired when they abuse inmates (who are mostly male and do not report either).
But we don't see those things, do we? We see powerful men defending the right to rape and harass women and you, sir, are part of that problem.
Go find a fucking therapist and dig deal into your issues regarding women with them. Don't do it in public and especially don't do it here.
Didn't mean to reply via PM. But, once you learn some reading comprehension, and can articulate a response without name calling, typing in capitals, and cursing, I'll respond to you.
Eivind August wrote:PuddysJacket wrote:Eivind August wrote:Edit: So, we don't know yet. People were saying that this sucks and that nobody is pure. Then you enter with the «We don't know, she might lie»-thing. What exactly prompted you to do that?
Probably the fact that the general sentiment on the first couple pages was "wow, nobody saw this coming....really sucks. Why are men like this?".....as if this was something definite, set in concrete. People lie all the time, that's why we have due process. If you're asking me to be open to the idea that the dude raped her while she was unconscious - of course. But taking one side of a story as fact is retarded, and is what almost everyone on this thread is doing.
Hate to point to the Gira thing again...but I had the same stance in that case and guess what? The chick was full of shit and just angry he didn't return her feelings.
Ok, good luck being right in a few percent of these cases. Hope that feeling of accomplishment is worth it.
In all seriousness, I see your general point (I think everyone here does), but I do not see the point of arguing so vehemently about it. Nobody in this thread had called Orri a rapist as far as I can tell. Most of us, however, seem to feel for the accuser in cases such as this, or at least to be empathetic to their struggle. I'm having a hard time seeing why anybody would think otherwise, which is why I called you out.
Jwar wrote:Nobody read my response. That’s cool! Tldr amirite?
Can we just like stop fighting here? I mean, it’s the internet and it’s going to go nowhere no matter what, sooooo what’s the point?
PuddysJacket wrote:
All I'm doing is remaining objective, that's it.
PuddysJacket wrote:But, once you learn some reading comprehension, and can articulate a response without name calling, typing in capitals, and cursing, I'll respond to you.
PuddysJacket wrote: But taking one side of a story as fact is retarded
PuddysJacket wrote:Didn't mean to reply via PM. But, once you learn some reading comprehension, and can articulate a response without name calling, typing in capitals, and cursing, I'll respond to you.
mr. sound boy king wrote:Organic apples are not normal, they are special, like analog, whereas normal apples, like digital, taste sterile and lack warmth.
friendship wrote:y u h8 swoosh woosh
Ghost Hip wrote:PuddysJacket wrote: But taking one side of a story as fact is retardedPuddysJacket wrote:Didn't mean to reply via PM. But, once you learn some reading comprehension, and can articulate a response without name calling, typing in capitals, and cursing, I'll respond to you.
You're out of here, bud.
If anyone else wants to be a sexist and ignorant piece of shit, PM me first and we can make this process a whole lot quicker. And if you disagree with this act of banning, you can get the fuck off my forum.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests