Moderator: Ghost Hip
jwar wrote:BRO! There is only one order! Bass>fuzz>fuzz>fuzz>fuzz>overdriven amp.
goroth wrote:Come up here and fuzz party. Yes. Fuzz party. It is a legit verb.
DRodriguez wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Like you IIRC.
I think active participation is more important than post count.
Aye, that's why I'm making note of it and encouraging it again. Maybe lenient was the wrong word choice to make that clear though.
We're on the same page though
oldangelmidnight wrote:Way to blow the secret, D.o.S.
Rule #1: All participants must secrete Satan. Those without Satanic glands must provide medical documentation.
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote:I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
daseb wrote:sorry dude, I apologise, val kilmer was a great songwriter and truly understood the mystic ways of the native american.
ALLisNOISE wrote:you can dial in some wonderfully smeared 12bit cascades of cicadas leveling a hail of rockets against an army of rusty box fans!
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote:I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
goroth wrote:
OAM you rule hard.
I shall attempt to top last year.
I may fail a little.
But still.
Topping shall be attempted.
Did anyone flake or was their any bullshit from last year that we could like... learn from... this year?
I'm interested in Johnny's take on this, but I voluntarily sat out my first year here as I kind of wanted to do a good job and didn't really know what was expected. And you involuntarily sat out, but are psyched for this year. Instead of post counts is it worth considering a) active user. and b) not first Christmas?
I'm aware that requirement a is potentially synonymous with worms in a can.
But I do wish to reiterate that ILFSS has been run so fricking well previously I see no real need to change anything.
D.o.S. wrote:Alternatively it sucks having to stalk someone that doesn't post actively (although I got theactionindex last year and that was a lot of fun)
D.o.S. wrote:Alternatively it sucks having to stalk someone that doesn't post actively
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
crochambeau wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Alternatively it sucks having to stalk someone that doesn't post actively
I just scrolled a few pages of my own posting history and concluded I would be a terribly obtuse individual to shop for. Satan secretion.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests