Chankgeez wrote:Soon to be popular last-minute Halloween costume?
Thats racist
Moderator: Ghost Hip
Chankgeez wrote:Soon to be popular last-minute Halloween costume?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Chankgeez wrote::idk: Maybe it is racist.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Chankgeez wrote:… they're all racist?
jrfox92 wrote:
The term is "problematic".
Faldoe wrote:Indeed. It's a term used by progressives to dismiss something they have a problem with, without actually explain why/how they have a problem with it. The use of the term in and of itself is supposed to be the argument/explanation.
Faldoe wrote:
Indeed. It's a term used by progressives to dismiss something they have a problem with, without actually explain why/how they have a problem with it. The use of the term in and of itself is supposed to be the argument/explanation.
TheTransient wrote:Faldoe wrote:
Indeed. It's a term used by progressives to dismiss something they have a problem with, without actually explain why/how they have a problem with it. The use of the term in and of itself is supposed to be the argument/explanation.
Sometimes you kind of want to express that something is kinda shit without having to spend an hour dissecting the issue because someone "doesn't get it"
And to be fair, that person who "doesn't get it" is likely to argue the contrary even if you present a fair and reasonable explanation/argument. Some people actually don't WANT to get it, and would prefer to stay in the safe, sheltered life of ignorance and hate, because that is often easier than questioning your own culture/history/opinions/feelings/ego etc.
TraceItalian wrote:Faldoe wrote:Indeed. It's a term used by progressives to dismiss something they have a problem with, without actually explain why/how they have a problem with it. The use of the term in and of itself is supposed to be the argument/explanation.
Whoda thunk that folks would have issue with folks dressing up in caricaturized outfits of civilizations their ancestor's fucked over in one way or another. Ain't this world crazy?
Faldoe wrote: This seems to imply anyone that uses "That is problematic" is in the right and the person asking for them to substantiate how is in the wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests