Moderator: mysteriousj
LaoWiz wrote:- The world needs more flanger.
ALLisNOISE wrote:you can dial in some wonderfully smeared 12bit cascades of cicadas leveling a hail of rockets against an army of rusty box fans!
sonidero wrote:I always like when you ride your Bike through...
I will always vote for Mo Cray Delay...
goroth wrote:throw a switch for insane LFO speeds and bam, cool ring mod.
mysteriousj wrote:Okay so as a general consensus TZF seems a good idea. Controls?
Pots: Range, Depth, Rate, Regen, Level, Shape(?)
Toggle Switches: Invert and Through Zero/Conventional Flanger.
A CV/Exp for LFO input and Regen/Rate/Depth.
Bypass and Tap Tempo foot switches. Could do envelope control too but not sure if I want to go that far..
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
tomlane95 wrote:I voted for flange and that sounds great!
Digital fuzz would have been my second choice and also sounds sick
Thru zero flange makes me think of space/time travel
Kaluza Kline flange?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza–Klein_theory
Digital fuzz makes me. Think of old computers
Difference engine?
http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/d/diffengi.htm
They are bad name ideas but the pedals sound like they are gonna be amazing
Tristan wrote:I voted for the In Limbo II, though for me multi tap isn't necessary, I'd just like an In Limbo with an external tap input.
I'm wondering what you mean with better CV / EXP control since it seems to have quite a lot of control possibilities already?
Oh yeah, it would be cool if you could add a quarter note triplet and eight note triplet division setting on there.
That sequencer seems mighty interesting too, I'm curious to know what it'll be like in the end.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest