by rustywire » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:03 am
For a bedroom studio you def don't need to break the bank.
I typically agree with "upgrade your budget and the money goes further" gear-sentiment but studio monitors are one of the exceptions.
Yes, Genelecs are going to perform incredibly even at their bottom tiers.
No, you don't need to buy Genelecs or otherwise save the money and stick to mixing with headphones.
As much as I adore the products, their pitch "creativity requires the best tools" rubs me the wrong way.
(anecdotally speaking, my riff-writing #1 is a $60 plywood guitar but that's neither here nor there)
I don't consider studio monitors "creative tools" as paintbrushes or paint, but rather the light fixture used to see, while creating.
You can produce a masterpiece under crystal chandeliers of the whitest light or a single bare incandescent bulb. User is the single most deterministic factor.
Arbitrary price points are silly. I got the JBL 305s as a pair for about $300 with stands...and XLRs...but their msrp advertise 250 each. Dont matter.
You don't need near-field monitors to extend down to 20Hz. Nor should you want that, IMO anyway. A rolloff in the upper 30s or 40s is fine; when adding a sub for 20-100Hz to make it a 2.1 system. For near-field monitoring anyway, to feel that bass in your chest. $400/speaker for studio monitoring across a larger room, yeah I dig that.
But unless you're planning to specialize in mastering, monitors only need to neutrally translate the source material to give an idea of what you've got so you can replay on a variety of different real world stereo systems and have the mix translate well. It doesn't need to be a perfect 1:1.
$400 monitors in a room full of hard surfaces without treatment...you'd be better off spending 400 for a pair and 400 on traps & diffusers. IMO anyway YMMV
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.