baremountain wrote:It's a type B/linear pot.
Have you *measured* it or are you going off printed code?
A drawing might help me visualize why the taper response flips in your application.
Moderator: Ghost Hip
baremountain wrote:It's a type B/linear pot.
crochambeau wrote:baremountain wrote:It's a type B/linear pot.
Have you *measured* it or are you going off printed code?
A drawing might help me visualize why the taper response flips in your application.
Inner Vegas wrote:I don't think anyone is Obama
V in > pot doing voltage divider > opamp doing actual voltage delivery based on what it sees at input and gain configuration > output
V in > opamp doing actual voltage delivery based on what it sees at input and gain configuration > pot dividing voltage > output
Inner Vegas wrote:I don't think anyone is Obama
crochambeau wrote:VR1 & VR2, the cap that's blocking 12VDC on the input of that regulator is a typo, right?
crochambeau wrote:JonnyAngle wrote:I'll take up your offer on a diagram RMA
Evan, it's just a variable resistor from 9v to 0v
Okay, Fig 1 depicts what you've got with the limited useful window of rotation. The upper point and lower point of rotation will have to be direct measured for the voltages that apply to your unit, I've just tossed a couple numbers there that are meaningless beyond the example.
So, first thing to do is determine the percentage of important voltages (in this case 6.8 is JUST BEFORE you start to observe the starved effect, and 3 is when the circuit falls flat), and know your supply voltage.
Supply voltage is 9.0, so 0.09 is one percent.
6.8 divided by 0.09 is roughly 75.56%.
3 volts is 33.33%
multi_s wrote:crochambeau wrote:VR1 & VR2, the cap that's blocking 12VDC on the input of that regulator is a typo, right?
IT;s not a blocking cap, its a DC supply drawn backwards.
multi_s wrote:Why even this won;t work for a circuit that draws any appreciable current and why voltage sag is still a dark art that is different with every pedal:
multi_s wrote:crochambeau wrote:VR1 & VR2, the cap that's blocking 12VDC on the input of that regulator is a typo, right?
IT;s not a blocking cap, its a DC supply drawn backwards.
Also none of the ideas presented will work that well.
Why linear pot gives non linear response at input:
its in llel with R8 in your drawing.
Why linear pot gives non linear resonse at output
it is in llel wiht the load of the circuit it is driving. its a tl072. who knows many reasons why it might not work.
cherler wrote:Baremountain, I wish I could help more but I really don't know what's going on in your drawing haha. One suggestion I could make though, since you're going for a DC amp here (right? the CV is at most super low frequency witha DC offset?) you could go for a rail-to-rail op amp. Then you'll have access to the full range of voltage you're powering them with and won't need to handle any reference shenanigans.
I'm thinking along the lines of giving each op amp +12/-12, reference the + pin to ground, and use a rotary switch to swap in different values for R2 for different gains and use an input pot to trim if need be. I have no idea if I'm even remotely on base with what you're trying to do though
Inner Vegas wrote:I don't think anyone is Obama
baremountain wrote:Alright so my terminology may be a little shaky. I use a second board that's essentailly converting to 12V bipolar power rails inside - that's AC, yeah?
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote:I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
Iommic Pope wrote:Fuck you guys.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests