sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
Sonaboy wrote:sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
moid wrote:chrisdermo wrote:5) A true stereo reverse reverb
The Digitech Hardwire RV7 can do that I think (I don't have one alas) but it has reverse reverb and is true stereo.
Chankgeez wrote:Sonaboy wrote:sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
Quality of sound?
Jwar wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Sonaboy wrote:sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
Quality of sound?
Come on now. You and I both know that's just silly.
All that needs to happen is someone who is savy tests the shit on multiple instruments to make sure it actually tracks versus just putting it out there. I honestly don't see how this could be that hard but I'm not dsp coder.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
sylnau wrote:Most digital octaver don't get along before a fuzz.
Chankgeez wrote:Jwar wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Sonaboy wrote:sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
Quality of sound?
Come on now. You and I both know that's just silly.
All that needs to happen is someone who is savy tests the shit on multiple instruments to make sure it actually tracks versus just putting it out there. I honestly don't see how this could be that hard but I'm not dsp coder.
It's not.
Analog octave down and digital octave down sound very different.
If I want something digital sounding, I'll go with the digital. If I want something analog sounding, I'll go with the analog.
Not to mention, as Syl mentioned, they behave differently when interacting with certain other types of pedals.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Jwar wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Jwar wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Sonaboy wrote:sylnau wrote:A clean octave down that is analog and track well.
why would analog make a difference here?
Quality of sound?
Come on now. You and I both know that's just silly.
All that needs to happen is someone who is savy tests the shit on multiple instruments to make sure it actually tracks versus just putting it out there. I honestly don't see how this could be that hard but I'm not dsp coder.
It's not.
Analog octave down and digital octave down sound very different.
If I want something digital sounding, I'll go with the digital. If I want something analog sounding, I'll go with the analog.
Not to mention, as Syl mentioned, they behave differently when interacting with certain other types of pedals.
It depends on who is listening. I'm not convinced the ear can discern the differences in the technologies. Maybe in a fuzz pedal, but even there, I'd be hard pressed to agree.
I feel you though.
Which digital octaves have you tried that worked poorly before fuzz? Just curious.
frodog wrote:Sylnau, I think a good bet for analog octave down that tracks well and is clean would b Parasit Studio's U-235. It's described as "semi-clean", has a sensitivity trimmer. I have a PCB on the way, will make a review once it's built.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests